• Follow me on Google+
  • Follow me on Facebook
  • Follow me on Twitter
  • Contact me on Skype
  • This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • Display the RSS feed

Concealed Medical Reports

Many of the medical reports that were part of the documentation in the hands of the District Attorney of Ventura, California, (the so-called "discovery package") were concealed and forcibly kept out of the trial.

The content of these reports makes it immediately clear why Judge James T. Cloninger and District Attorney Gilbert Romero concealed them becoming accomplices in the crimes of falsification of trial evidence committed by Rebecca McKay White and her complacent doctors.

To access all the documentation of this Kafkaesque trial visit The People vs Carlo Parlanti.

Discovery Package 000656-663

The first problem observed in the documentation provided by Dr. Troy Manchester to the Ventura Police is that it is not signed!!! Or rather, if you look at the end of the report, highlighted in red, you'll see that all signatures are missing including that of Dr. Troy Manchester but then, sifting through the rest of the documentation, we find the signature of Tavita Hurtado in the release sheet and the initials of Kanika Smith in the billing section (both highlighted in yellow).

As shown in detail by Dr. Benedetta Guidi, how could the Ventura Police issue a warrant of arrest on the basis of documentation that is not signed? And most of all, given the huge internal contradictions of this report, is it really authored by Dr. Troy Manchester? Do not forget that at least one of the assistants of Dr. Troy Manchester, Kanika Smith,is coincidentally best friends with Rebecca McKay White.

 Where is Troy Manchester's signature?

Reading the objective examination of the report you will discover the biggest internal contradictions (the diagnosis does not agree at all with the observations) and external contradictions (it seems that the Dr. Manchester who testified at the trial is not the same person who made these objective observations. As the police noticed already 4 days before, the skin and eyes are completely free of injury or bruising, yellow in the picture below, but even more important all the dramatic injuries recounted to half the world by Rebecca McKay White (jaw dislocated, skull fractures, loss of cerebral spinal fluid, etc ...) are explicitly refuted in the objective examination of this doctor in the part highlighted in orange in the picture below. 

It is really difficult at this point to continue to wonder why Judge James T. Cloninger and District Attorney Gilbert Romero hid this documentation and forcibly kept it out of the trial proceedings.

 Is there something wrong with Rebecca McKay White?

But there is even worse: how could Dr. Troy Manchester make a diagnosis of contusion of the back and domestic violence (unfortunate victim of recurrent and severe domestic violence nontheless) when he himself, in red in the image above, observed a back without edema, bruises nor visible deformities? With what courage this illustrious professional diagnostics two broken ribs and then observes, still in red, that there are no problems to the chest, breathing is normal and even manages to beat it to auscultate? 

Remember Rebecca McKay White's picture, taken by the Ventura Police, where she raises her arm higher than her head to lift her shirt and show her side (which, moreover, appears without bruises)? Have you never seen a person whith two ribs broken a week before (or two depending on the different versions of Mrs. White) raise like that the arm on the exact same side of the rib fractures? 

Is there anyone in California who doesn't lie?

Read more: Discovery Package 000656-663

Discovery Package 000671

This clinical note from August 9th, 2002, annotated again on September 5th, shows again (if it was needed) how Rebecca McKay White has repeatedly lied to the doctors and the Ventura Police and Court.

Still more lies by Rebecca Mckay White

Comparing the note highlighted in orange with the letter sent from Rebecca McKay White to Dr. Troy Manchester, one can observe how White lies about her refusals to undergo specialist visits (gynecological or other) ... obviously she has always refused to undergo visits that would easily highlighted her lies, but the she tries to justify theserefusals in many different, colorful ways.

But there is more, much more: at trial Rebecca McKay White will recount, along with all other horrors, being bitten on both nipples to the point of laceration, with even the bleeding of the left one. As you can see in the note, highlighted in red, White has undergone a mammogram that found a benign cyst exactly in the area where there should have been the lacerations. Since the first phase of such an exam is a local palpation, it seems highly unlikely that she had any tear from human bites to the left nipple and that the doctors didn't care about them. 

Another one of the many inventions (mandibles dislocated, skull fractures, loss of cerebral-spinal liquid, etc.) of a woman who, at this point, is really difficult not to define a psychopath.

Read more: Discovery Package 000671

Discovery Package 000673-674

Dr. Jeff Bivens's Crime

Thre are basically two "impossibilities" (or better crimes) that can be found in the certificate issued by Dr. Jeff Bivens on August 16th 2002 (highlighted in yellow and red in the image and that can be verified in the complete document below):


If the Police photographed the woman without bruising to the face on July 18th, 2002 how is it possible for some bruising (consequence of the alleged assault at the end of June, or the beginning of July, depending on the version) to happear in August?

Dr. Benedetta Guidi explained it very well in her expert report denouncing these crimes:

On the basis of such considerations, therefore, it is possible to state the absolute chronological incompatibility between the periorbital ecchymosis (“black eye”) detected by Dr. Bivens and the alleged trauma inflicted by Carlo Parlanti.
Such injuries, ascertained during the examination, necessarily must have an origin subsequent to the reported blows of June 29th, 2002.
In addition, no injuries were reported at the time of the police report on July 18th, 2002, as proved by the photographs taken at such time by the police detectives, nor at the time of the first medical examination performed by Dr. Manchester on July 22nd, 2002, whose report is silent in regards to such injuries.


Dr. Jeff Bivens has been made aware of the "torture and sexual assault" invented by the twisted minds of White ... but then how does he justify a rape with the entire forearm in a woman to whom both ovaries and uterus have been removed as long as 20 (twenty) years before?

This last "contradiction" would deserve to be taken as the plot for a soap opera If it hadn't costed the life, affects and career of the brilliant Italian manager!

Finally a curiosity (just to avoid calling it yet another perjury) in orange: why the hell does a woman with two fractured ribs on her right side of the rib cage prefer to lie on her right side?? 

Read more: Discovery Package 000673-674

Discovery Package 000665

These notes are from the first meeting, which took place on September 23rd, 2002, between Rebecca McKay White and Dr. Benjamin Fore.

Rebecca McKay White refuses all specialist exams

The only significant thing that we can see, highlighted in orange in the image above, is that whenever doctors worry about the horror stories told by Rebecca McKay White and offer specialist exams, she systematically refuses!

Read more: Discovery Package 000665

Discovery Package 000668-670

Request to Dr. Robert Patzkowsky for medical treatment provided to Rebecca White as a result of a crime happened on July 12th, 2002.

Read more: Discovery Package 000668-670

Discovery Package 000666

This medical note has been drawn up by Dr. Benjamin Fore on November 5th, 2002. If the medical report issued by Dr. Jeff Bivens on August 16th, 2002 is absurd, as it tries to prove the existence of bruises on the face of Rebecca McKay White as long as one month after the Ventura Police confirmed with pictures and testimony that the woman had no black eye, this medical note by the hand of Dr. Benjamin Fore can only be described as paradoxical: it tries to affirm that on November 5th of the same year, that is as much as 4 (FOUR) months after the Police pictures, Rebecca McKay White would have a very black eye (emphasis in the document and you can see it highlighted in red in the image below).

very black eye resulting from being beat up in Ju

As if that was not enough, the upstanding Dr. Benjamin Fore also attests to the nature of the injury and puts it in writing that the very black eye is due to the beating suffered in Ju (the copy is incomplete but can only be in June or July); we repeat 4 (FOUR) months prior to the visit. 

Many journalists and TVs have tried to contact Dr. Benjamin Fore to have him explain the miracle of these bruises which appear again not only four months after an alleged beating, but above all three months after a Police department verified even with photographs that there were no bruises on the face of Rebecca McKay White. Dr. Benjamin has obviously always refused in abstentia... thus defending his sacred right to invent out of the blue medical observations to endorse the false accusations of his patients: Congratulations Dr. Fore, congratulations! 

Read more: Discovery Package 000666

Discovery Package 000667

Another medical note, by the hand of Dr. Benjamin Fore, on December 23rd, 2002. This time Dr. Fore simply records generic itching and rashes from head to toe.

Read more: Discovery Package 000667

Discovery Package 000917-920

In April 2005, that is exactly when Germany decides to extradite Carlo Parlanti, Rebecca McKay White begins again to present symptoms due to the alleged beatings of three years before and this after a complete medical silence of two years and four months.

The medical history recorded from Neurologist Dr. Neil L. Pugach (to whom Rebecca McKay White was referred from Dr. Tom Freeman) is absolutely shocking, especially when compared with the objective findings in the medical report from Dr. Troy Manchester on July 22nd, 2002. The doctor and the woman now give for granted rhinorrea, skull fracture, dislocation of the jaw, etc.. Obviously it is hard to believe that such a Neurologist as Dr. Neil L. Pugach would believe to a skull fracture with internal bleeding that resolved spontaneously or believe that a colleague would leave to the free will of the patient whether or not to see a specialist in the presence of such a fracture (shoudn't there be a mandatory hospitalization with a skull fracture bleeding within the skull?). 

The fact is that after collecting the history, with its endless list of symptoms, the Neurologist proceeds with a careful observation of the patient by making dozens of tests and examinations... and all these examinations and tests are negative! By the way, remember that this report is addressed to Dr. Tom Freeman and is therefore a professional communication between a specialist and the doctor who referred a patient. 

Everything OK with Ms. Rebecca McKay White

As you can see above highlighted in green, all the symptoms reported by Rebecca McKay White were refuted one by one from the normal neurological tests such as finger-to-nose with eyes closed and heel-knee. Yet the lady lamented lack of balance, disorientation and dizziness. And below Pugach reports the results of an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and an EEG (Electroencephalogram) that have certainly been performed to assess the residual consequences of the skull fracture and bleeding inside the skull with loss of cerebral-spinal fluid from the nose. But we already know what to expect because we have already seen the objective observations made by Dr. Troy Manchester who, two weeks after the alleged assault, did not record any of the injuries that Rebecca McKay White has invented out of the blue for all other doctors.

And this is the reason why Neurologist Neil L. Pugach concludes by expressing his concerns with a phrase that leaves no room for doubt: I'm really not sure how to put all this together at this time (in red above). He also requests other exams to try to give an explanation for the symptoms of the woman; he especially requests another MRI, this time with contrast dye (dye injected into the bloodstream to highlight the blood capillaries), because let's face it: skull fractures do not disappear and MRI are made just to observe them. 

The migraine declarations by Rebecca McKay White

We also ask you to pay attention to two particular points of the medical history (here above in yellow) and to keep them in mind for a comparison to be done later with Discovery Package 000906. The patient tells the doctor that she had suffered from migraines since she was 30 and that the disorder was even present in her family history. The patient also informs the doctor that she had had a hysterectomy that we know goes back to twenty years before the medical report signed by Dr. Jeff Bivens... keep that in mind. 

Read more: Discovery Package 000917-920

Discovery Package 000916

A telephone conversation between Rebecca McKay White and Neurological Associates of Hampton Roads on May 23rd, 2005.

Read more: Discovery Package 000916

Discovery Package 000915

That of May 23rd, 2005 is the second report submitted by Neurologist Neil L. Pugach to Dr. Tom Freeman about the investigations on the physical conditions of Rebecca McKay White. We have to say that Dr. Pugach is seriously investigating the complaints of the patient: the new blood tests are normal, MRI with contrast dye (contrast enhanced MRI scan) finds no sign of skull fracture, bleeding inside the skull and loss of cerebral-spinal fluid from the nose (we would be surprised by the opposite situation seen the completely a-traumatic situation recorded by Dr. Troy Manchester on July 22nd, three years earlier). Along with this exams, which we have highlighted below in green, we have also highlighted a visit with an ophthalmologist, even this negative.

It's really impossible to find something wrong with Rebecca McKay White

But why an exam by an ophthalmologist? Well, if we read the rest of the report we find that Neurologist Neil L. Pugach is planning to have Rebecca McKay White take an endocrinological exam (in orange above): obviously this respected professional is beginning to suspect that the dizziness and balance problems in White are due to poor eyesight and hormonal problems! 

He is also planning a stress electrocardiogram and an evaluation of sleep (also in orange).

One thing is for sure: Neurologist Neil L. Pugach has stopped completely to talk with Dr. Tom Freeman of any traumatic consequence of criminal origin. In fact, as you can see highlighted in red in the image above, quietly admits that when it comes to the episodes of disorientation (getting lost) he does not have a good explanation. 

Read more: Discovery Package 000915

Discovery Package 000914

A telephone conversation between Rebecca McKay White and Neurological Associates of Hampton Roads on June 27th, 2005.

Read more: Discovery Package 000914

Discovery Package 000913

A telephone conversation between Rebecca McKay White and Neurological Associates of Hampton Roads on June 28th, 2005.

Read more: Discovery Package 000913

Discovery Package 000912

Finally, in the report of July 21st, 2005 Neurologist Neil L. Pugach reaches an eureka moment and announces to Dr. Tom Freeman that, although the endocrinologist has not suggested starting an hormone treatment for Rebecca McKay White, she also had a gynecological examination and the doctor has recommended Synthroid (a thyroid synthetic hormone) as we highlighted in green in the image below.

Finally an eureka moment for Neil L. Pugach and Tom Freeman

Immediately after Pugach recommends Freeman to see White to discuss her hormonal problems, obviously caused by the more than twenty years old, surgically induced, menopause caused from having had a total hysterectomy in 1982 seen as they are now highlighted by a gynecologist, and the daily nausea problems. 

Eureka ... finally something that doesn't work with Rebecca McKay White!

Have you noticed how nobody is talking anymore, obviously, of assaults, rapes, torture, kicks to the head, rapes and sodomy with forearms and hands? So far it seems that what happened between April and July of 2005 is the latest attempt from Rebecca McKay White to accumulate medical records damaging Carlo Parlanti to turn to the District Attorney of Ventura. It's no coincidence that the symptoms of Rebecca McKay White started again two years and four months after the last medical report was filed and, coincidentally, just immediately after Germany's decision to extradite Carlo Parlanti to Ventura, California.

Read more: Discovery Package 000912

Discovery Package 000911

A telephone conversation between Rebecca McKay White and Neurological Associates of Hampton Roads on July 25th, 2005.

Read more: Discovery Package 000911

Discovery Package 000910

A telephone conversation between Rebecca McKay White and Neurological Associates of Hampton Roads on September 12th, 2005.

Read more: Discovery Package 000910

Discovery Package 000906

And finally, here is a letter of the esteemed Neurologist Neil L. Pugach dated November 23rd, 2005 and addressed To Whom it May Concern. Of all the medical crimes that we have documented in this timeline this is probably the most cold, calculated, horrible in his evil; also because this letter was prepared on the eve of the trial against Carlo Parlanti and therefore had only the purpose to swing and influence the trial. Certainly District Attorney Gilbert Romero was more than happy to show this letter to Judge James T. Cloninger who, as he demonstrated during the trial, drunk it up completely!

But let's see the contents: Pugach begins by summarizing the horrible tortures and rape suffered by White highlighting the worst physical consequences for the poor victim. He starts, as you can see in the comparison below, with the spinal fluid leak from her nose (indicating a fracture of the base of the skull). Didn't he himself evaluate not one but two negative MRIs while looking for these mysterious fractures? And anyway, why did he lie hiding even to have made these exams at all?

Lie To Whom it May Concern Lie To Whom it May Concern
Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman


The Neurologist Neil L. Pugach states that one of the consequences of the severe beating was the onset of strong migraines... but wait a moment, are we wrong or in his first report he discovered that Rebecca McKay White suffered from migraines since the age of 30? and even that migraine was part of her family history?

Lie To Whom it May Concern Lie To Whom it May Concern
Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman
Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman


For Neurologist Dr. Neil L. Pugach now Rebecca McKay White has cognitive impairements, such that she would lose things and then she has difficulty making chang in a store, difficulty understanding directions, disturbances with her speech, and she bumps into things. She has considerable short-term memory loss, although very little problems with long-term memory.

But he was the one to state in his first report that She is alert and fully oriented with intact attention and concentration, language and recent and remote recall. Not to mention the balance and station tests... loses her balance? bungs into objects? how can a doctor lie so blatantly knowing full well that he will send to prison a poor innocent? 

Even worse: please note the sophistication of the lie. Rebecca McKay White has problems with short-term memory but not with long-term... of course, otherwise she could not testify about what happened three years prior. Congratulations Dr. Neil L. Pugach you thought of everything; not only you changed your mind in comparison with your own observations of a Rebecca McKay White with intact recent and remote recall but you do it in a way to preserve her possibility to witness and destroy the life of Carlo Parlanti.

Lie To Whom it May Concern Lie To Whom it May Concern
Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman
Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman


And finally Neurologist Neil L. Pugach masterpiece: Based on this history provided to me to by the patient, and my experience in practicing neurology for the last 17 years, I have no doubt that the patient has suffered a substantial traumatic brain injury as a result of the beating she received, and has permanent brain deficits, causing the above mentioned symptoms. Because the symptoms have gone on for this long, it is not medically probable that there will be any significant improvement in these symptoms over time. Therefore, I consider her to have permanent major deficits in her overall functioning due to the injuries she sustained from this beating. I believe that these deficits are severe enough to preclude her from being able to perform any kind of work in the future.

What happened to the tests and exams conducted and meticulously reported to Dr. Tom Freeman? What happened to the diagnosis reported by Neil L. Pugach to the same Dr. Freeman? How can a doctor who has pronounced an Hippocratic oath lie so blatantly? How can a medical professional steal the life of an innocent man inventing this kind of report and signing the exact opposite of what he has attested before? 

Lie To Whom it May Concern Lie To Whom it May Concern
Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman

Truth for Dr. Tom Freeman


Talking about signatures: many professionals and journalists (even RAI [the Italian State TV - TN]) have tried to get explanations from Neurologist Dr. Neil L. Pugach about the incredible statements signed by him, but Pugach has always denied. This has raised in us a suspicion we honestly had before and that is that Rebecca McKay White (or some accomplice of her in Dr. Neil L. Pugach's office) may have forged the letter that the District Attorney Gilbert Romero used to influence Judge James T. Cloninger and get him mad at Carlo Parlanti. Well, let's do this: we leave this up to you as an exercise; look at the signatures of the various documents in the image below!

Signature To Whom it May Concern Signature To Whom it May Concern
Signatures for Dr. Tom Freeman

Signatures for Dr. Tom Freeman

Signatures for Dr. Tom Freeman

Signatures for Dr. Tom Freeman


Read more: Discovery Package 000906