If you'd like to help us raising funds in order to grant Carlo a fair trial, you can donate some money by clicking the button above. Even a little money can make the difference. Thank you!
Contact me here |
"Few hundreds' criminals may also be released into liberty, but not even one
innocent must end up in prison, because this would transform the entire
legal system into a criminal system" (Venkatraman Iyer)
|
|
|
Reply to Mr. Wold
Dear Mr. Wold
I receivd a reply from your District and I need to point out
a few things:
The documentation provided has not been presented only in
favor of Carlo Parlanti, but there are some reports for
those individuals who violated the law...
Download the complete email in pdf HERE
05 luglio 2009Dear Mr. Wold,
As I told in advance to the Detective Greg Hayes I’m here to let you know that I will write you to about other abuses and inconsistent facts in the Carlo Parlanti’s case.
I'm sorry if you will receive some e-mail from me but I am very glad to believe that also in Ventura County, Justice can be restored.
As I told you, the same statements and documents I sent to you are also given with the claim to:
To the California’s Attorney General
To the department of Justice of the United States
To the Bar Association of California’s lawyers
To the Monterey County
To the FBI
To the Italian Government
It's also been sent to the medical board of California and Oklahoma.
In the documentation there are several items that are still under investigation and I would like that you could take them in consideration.
Please if this is not the correct manner to inform you, let me know the correct procedure:
1) June 29 2002, day of the alleged rape, a phone call was made at 10.24 PM from the home telephone number that is used in special occasions from the cellular of Mrs. White.
It would be interesting to track all phone calls from Mr. Carlo Parlanti to exclude that Mr. Parlanti was not at the telephone with someone while beating and raping wildly the woman (as accused).
2) Mrs. White got a total hysterectomy at the age of 30 years and it would be interesting in addition of what in the reports, to know if a woman without ovaries and womb can be penetrated by a hand and forearm of Mr. Parlanti ( Deposition of December 13 2005)
3) In the trial against Mr. Parlanti, another woman testified: Mrs. Sandra Lavagnino/Philips, we arrived at the conclusion that the woman was already in contact for some time with Mrs. White and Mrs. Hollingworth, former psychotherapist of Mr. Carlo Parlanti, that profaning the law had a relation with the Mr Parlanti.
In addition Mrs. Lavagnino was client of a sexy shop in Monterey Nu Art in Fremont Street between Monterey and Seaside.
This will prove the not reliable position of Mrs. Lavagnino that in addition has violated the law several times paying with check an illegal abortion of a Mexican minor that had a relation with the husband. Taking in consideration that in the conversation with Mr Romero he believes that the main proofs a 3 and more precisely:
1. The reliability of Mrs. Rebecca White
2. The broken ribs
3. The deposition of Mrs. Lavagnino
All the allegations and proofs to sustain them produced by the investigations until now are not relevant any more.
It is very important to find a connection with Mrs Hollingworth , (that in reality is the one that got the most of the advantages by Mr. Parlanti arrest) to analyze the diary, all maliciously made up.
The JDE staff that in 2002 was in charge of the June Focus confirmed us that the Diary were supplied for the first time on June 2002 in Dever and this is a proof that Mrs White couldn’t write before that date.
All this confirm and proof only a small part of all lies made up by Mrs White to live at California’s State expenses.
It is important to understand that the only proof supplied by the Accusation are:
The Diaries
The Calendar
The pictures
It is incredible that all 3 evidences were presented 3 years later in 2005 after that the Detectives of your County informed Mrs White that there were no withness to testify any evidence of violence against her.
The calendar was declared false before the trail and not admitted as evidence.
All other evidences were found as consequence of our private investigations.
Please I would like to be informed about the status of your part of job in this matter.in order I will send to you some information, please confirme me you can receved that
In attach an email Ms Lavagnino wrote to detective, that is mean no trial can begin when a crazy woman make accusation based her stantement and the stantement from Ms Hollingworth prouve she search to have benefit from that.
Best regards
Katia Anedda
|
- 
- 
