For the Attention of the Attorney General of the State of Calif

ID 2- Carlo Parlanti’s Case

No. Case: 2002026651

Ventura County, CA

Katia Anedda, born in Wiesbaden (Germany) on the 26 February 1967 (NDDKTA67B66Z112Y), residing in Eboli (SA) Via U. Nobile 14 c/o Avv.ti Franco Cardiello and Costantino Cardiello, of whom she is represented. Acting as General Attorney in virtue of the notorial act no. 247/2008 lodged with the Italian Consulate and the form A 250 General Power of Attorney dated March 20th, 2006 public notary deed drawn by Philip Durante Comm. 1625780 by Mr. Carlo Parlanti, born in Montecatini Terme on 1^st November 1964 and at this moment detained at the 2^nd level State Prison of Avenal (CA, U.S.A), declares as follows:

Mr. Carlo Parlanti, an Italian citizen who moved to the United States for work purposes was sentenced to nine years imprisonment for alleged rape.

The trial was based entirely on the statement of the alleged victim, Ms. Rebecca White who made use of false evidence which she had previously set up and on stories of facts that never took place.

The background of the entire proceedings is amply described in the report already sent by ordinary mail and again presented by Katia Anedda herself.

This report directs attention specifically to the features of the case that demonstrate a violation of the penal code of the United States.

The first doctor who examined her (Dr. Troy Munchester) after twenty days did not notice anything (apart from a fractured rib which will be further dealt with in a later section of this document) and the patient did not complain of any pain, apart from the rib, Find attached the registered documents numbered 000656/657/658/559/660/661/662/663/664

At the time of the examination, all visible signs had disappeared as well as all the pains according to the medical reports however it is written in the medical history of the patient that the woman had suffered severe vaginal violence with pains which were healing (he also tried to shove his hand up my vagina ad far…as it could go….painful. But in proving) whilst at the hearing on the 15^th December 2005 at the Ventura Court the same doctor, (Dr. Troy Manchester) testified that the woman had not complained of problems to the vaginal organs. . It was only two years later (July 2004), in a letter addressed to that doctor, Dr. Manchester, (registered attachment no. 000664) in view of the imminent trial and hearing, she reminds him that the pain in the inguinal area did not go away until after one year. After two years she wrote to this first doctor who had examined her, expressing in the letter things that she had not revealed before: the hand inside her anus, three broken teeth, something that no-one had seen and which had not been mentioned until now.

Dr. Manchester testified that the woman had told him the policeman had “told her that they could not proceed with the complaint until a doctor’s examination had taken place in order to enable them to substantiate the damage”, just two days after complaint had been filed.

Dr. Munchester ‘s report 000656/657/658/659/660/661/662/663 does not report any injury apart from two broken ribs, and no pain.

Dr. Manchester draws up a certificate that states “ skin intact, warm, dry, no visible rasch or remarkable lesion”; “head atraumatic” “back: no redness, no edema, no bruising, no visible deformity” “Eyes sclera white and clear”.

She even talks about the broken ribs on a casual meeting with the maintenance man.

Ms. White discovered this injury too quickly. In her account she says, in fact, that she realised that her ribs were broken while she was being beaten. She is so sure of the fracture that she says at a certain point that Mr. Parlanti had told her how to get up off the ground despite the broken ribs. It could be possible that the fracture did not necessarily originate on the night of the 29^th June for the reason expressed in the expert’s report given by Dr. Pozzi to which we refer you as it is of greater reliability than the words of the writer.

But the broken ribs come up, as has already been mentioned, even in the conversation with the maintenance man who she met on her return from the laundry and to whom “I said that I had two broken ribs”. Not only did she know of her injury, some weeks before the doctor’s examination, but she knew exactly that there were two broken ribs.

During the trial Dr. Manchester testifies that he remembers the woman in the company of her daughter. In her letter of July 2004 Ms. White writes reminding the doctor that she went to his surgery with a friend named Kanika Smith. The report indicates the sign in time as being 13.37 on the registered page 000656 and the time on the registered page 000663 is 12.07 pm but the print (stamp) of the registered bill 00662 shows the time as 1.46pm. These times give rise to doubt regarding the movements of Ms.White who at 1.01pm makes a call to the house phone of Carlo Parlanti whilst at 2.10 pm makes a call to the cell phone of the daughter, who according to the statements of the daughter and Ms. White were supposed to be at the same place together. Added to this is the telephonic tracing, registered file no. 000726 in the column “call from”, indicating from what centre the call is made, therefore the position of the client, the initials “SM” appear which could not necessarily be Monterey where the surgery of the doctor is.

This complaint is made with the intention of prosecution for the crimes that the American Authorities will wish to consider completed by the exposition of the facts narrated, which require precise and immediate investigation. It must be said that there will be other complaints following this one to speed up the enquiries into any perpetration of other crimes, committed before, during and after the trial against Carlo Parlanti for the sole purpose of reaching a sentence of criminal responsibility founded on the distortion of facts.