Spett

ID 3 - Carlo Parlanti’s Case

No. Case: 2002026651

Ventura County, CA

Katia Anedda, born in Wiesbaden (Germany) on the 26 February 1967 (NDDKTA67B66Z112Y), residing in Eboli (SA) Via U. Nobile 14 c/o Avv.ti Franco Cardiello and Costantino Cardiello, of whom she is represented. Acting as General Attorney in virtue of the notorial act no. 247/2008 lodged with the Italian Consulate and the form A 250 General Power of Attorney dated March 20th, 2006 public notary deed drawn by Philip Durante Comm. 1625780 by Mr. Carlo Parlanti, born in Montecatini Terme on 1^st November 1964 and at this moment detained at the 2^nd level State Prison of Avenal (CA, U.S.A), declares as follows:

Mr. Carlo Parlanti, an Italian citizen who moved to the United States for work purposes was sentenced to nine years imprisonment for alleged rape.

The trial was based entirely on the statement of the alleged victim, Ms. Rebecca White who made use of false evidence which she had previously set up and on stories of facts that never took place.

The background of the entire proceedings is amply described in the report already sent by

This report directs attention specifically to the features of the case that demonstrate a violation

On July 18, 2002 the Ventura (California) police made an inspection of the crime scene that

indicated no traces of the alleged crime (no evidence of a fight; the house was imperfect

order). The presumed victim did not provide validated photographs suitable to confirm the

injuries she claimed. The police, following their procedures, took some photos of the victim

on July 18 that did not show any signs of the results of violence or of injuries that had healed.

At the preliminary hearing (tree years after her complaint) does Ms. White present the photos

which show her with signs of injuries to her face and according to her account these photos

were taken the Wednesday after the event (therefore the 3^rd July), (items of evidence at the

Now, it is strange that these photos were not handed over straight away to the police to confirm what she had reported, also because Ms. White knew that from the photos taken by the police it would be obvious that they had evidence against her and, therefore there was even more reason for her to hand over the other photos in her possession.

However, even to an inexpert eye it is immediately obvious that the photos of Ms. White showing noticeable injuries to her face were taken some years previously because she appears much younger and her hair is much shorter than in the photos taken by the police on the 18^th July, therefore fifteen days later.

The authenticity of the photos and their relevance to the testimony of the presumed victim at

the trial were analyzed by Scc. H. Newby who contests their authenticity in a written report attached to this report. The sequence of events, declarations, and photographic reconstructions were analyzed in the report of criminologist Marco Strano from pages 19 to 24.

Ms. White also stated that she had taken the photos to provide evidence for a subsequent complaint

During the prosecution of Mr Parlanti they provided to the Public Prosecutor some diaries that according to an analysis made by Professor Marco Strano Point B - Pag 27 seemed to be made on purpose

This complaint is made with the intention of prosecution for the crimes that the American

Authorities will wish to consider completed by the exposition of the facts narrated, which

require precise and immediate investigation. It must be said that there will be other

complaints following this one to speed up the enquiries into any perpetration of other crimes,

committed before, during and after the trial against Carlo Parlanti for the sole purpose of

reaching a sentence of criminal responsibility founded on the distortion of facts.